[via image]
Less than 24 hours that the scientist broecker first to use the term «global warming" and predict the temperature rise in your article for the magazine Science in 1974 that just reiterate how necessary it is adopt stronger measures against this great climate change, a change «caused by greenhouse gas emissions and derived from human activities from the industrial revolution«.
As it catches my attention in the article is that although 35 years have passed the term "climate change" has become more of a topic of table talk that starting point of what should be a imminent industrial change. We continue to see advertisements for motor cars every day, we see hundreds of planes flying overhead burning kerosene, listening to companies that boast of selling the best V12 engines when ethanol or electric cars could be used. Why is this line continued? ¿why "climate change" continues to be a table talk and beneficial solutions are sought for all?
The human being is self-destructive, we live from day to day without seriously worrying about a future that most of us seems uncertain and no matter how much we talk about how important it is not to damage the ozone layer tomorrow we will go to the supermarket on the corner and We will continue to buy the roll-on or spray that is cheaper for us .
Climate change is the cause of the economic interests of governments, of industry, of human activity.Companies do not want to get off the vine because a greater crisis than the one we are currently facing may occur and it would be necessary to find economic alternatives and profitability ... You already know the saying: »If you do not put a carrot in front of the donkey, the donkey does not walk«.
By this same rule of three the solution I have just presented:Give me economic performance and I will adapt to what you want.
Industry and Government are the ones who have to take an active part in what could be called el Great Industrial Change,What? making use and developing alternatives based on the interest of humanityBut for this to happen, it would have to be put in another way: »Your company is going to fill its pockets developing this type of investment but never putting the benefit of humanity before your own economy.«. (We speak of the government industry, mainly responsible for humanity's conduct in one way or another)
There are solutions, but no one wants to stop making a profit.Would you be willing to work for free?This is the main problem on a larger scale, so existing solutions are not applied. Neither companies nor the government want to abandon their profitability and stability even knowing that the crisis that will occur with climate change will touch the apocalyptic.
¿Real and effective solutions in brief? penalties, fines, investing in alternative energies, prosecuting the illegalities that continue to be our daily bread, seeking alternative benefits to those companies that are going to go into crisis, since Any change in your production chain will be reduced by investing in another type of industrial structure. Unfortunately, the solutions have always been presented as a simple equation:
Solutions to climate change = Macroinvestment = economic losses
Alternative Energy = Low Performance = Low Productivity = Economic Losses
And we enter an endless chain. It is necessary to change the approach:To guarantee to the industries that their contribution will produce profitability and the only viable solution For the industrial world to accept any modification regarding its market is that these are succulent to your pocket in the short and medium term, never NEVER long term.
Industry and production do not understand moral reasonsThe government does not understand love or fraternity, it understands numbers on paper, and it is that door that must be opened.
Industrial consciousness now.
Like there are industries that profit from war and famine hToday there are other companies that are benefiting from this situation: sun creams, sun umbrellas, goggles, tanning controlled with UVA rays, Real Estate, companies of »protective» fabrics, air conditioners ...And are those industrial scavengers to which there would be eradicate now.
Finally I want to clarify that the subject itself is quite extensive, I could spend hours writing and expanding on some specific points that have been left in an outline.
Thank you.-
Mónica
This post belongs to "100 post on climate change"
http://www.efiquest.es/100-post-sobre-cambio-climatico/